Short Takes On News & Events

Study: Health Law Protected Young Adults From High Hospital Bills

By Sarah Varney

May 29th, 2013, 5:07 PM

Researchers at the RAND Corporation set out to find some hard data on one aspect of the health law: Does having medical insurance protect young adults from the financial ruin that often comes with a major injury or illness? The quick answer: Yes, it does.

Since September 2010, the Affordable Care Act has allowed young adults to remain on their parents’ medical insurance until they turn 26, and an estimated 3.1 million young people have taken advantage of the new rule.

The RAND researchers looked at nearly a half a million visits young adults made to emergency departments around the country before and after the under-26 provision took effect.

“We looked at just the most serious conditions,” said Andrew Mulcahy, an associate policy researcher at the RAND Corporation. Mulcahy and his colleagues pored over actual hospital records for bone fractures, poison, traumatic brain injuries, and other incidents that would require an urgent trip to the hospital.

The RAND analysis, published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine, found that the new law resulted in $147 million in hospital bills charged to private insurance companies in 2011.

“Some of those costs would have been born by individuals,” said Mulcahy. “Some of those costs would have been ultimately been born by hospitals as uncompensated care.”

Indeed, as might be expected when any uninsured people gain coverage, the young adults insured under their parents’ plans were shielded from the potentially catastrophic costs of a medical emergency.

“That’s exactly what the law intended,” said Marian Mulkey, director of Health Reform and Public Programs Initiative at the non-partisan California HealthCare Foundation.

But the millions of newly insured adults didn’t come for free, added Mulkey. “The cost of covering those people was spread over all the people with similar coverage who paid a little bit more in their premiums,” she said.

Those added premium costs were likely to be fairly low, since young adults consume much less health care and can help to balance out the higher medical bills of their parents and other older workers.

For hospitals though, more insured customers is unequivocally good news, especially when those new customers have private insurance which pays more than Medicare or Medicaid.

One of the goals of the health law was to reduce the number of unpaid hospital bills, said Joseph Antos, a health care policy expert at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute. To the extent that people sign up for insurance when the online marketplaces open in the fall – and more young adults continue to sign up on their parents’ plans – that just might work.

“Then I think we’ll be successful in reducing uncompensated care,” Antos said. “In other words, more of those services will be paid fully, and more of those services will be paid at a higher rate than they were before.”

4 Responses to “Study: Health Law Protected Young Adults From High Hospital Bills”

  1. Those added premium costs were likely to be fairly low, since young adults consume much less health care and can help to balance out the higher medical bills of their parents and other older workers. “Study: Health Law Protected Young Adults From High Hospital Bills” . Very Good post, i am sharing this post on my Social Media Marketing.

  2. HM in Florida says:

    The concept of everyone exposed to the cost of health care contributing to the cost of health care results in a lower overall cost to those who were paying in the umbalanced environment which exists today. This not an unreasonable expectation. It will take time to change the system. You do not turn a battleship on a dime. It will take costs from some audiences and add costs to others but overall we will benefit from the long term changes. Imagine how successful this would be and how quickly it could occur if everyone was onboard with the effort working toward the eventual goal of lower costs.

  3. Ray says:

    I must disagree. Saying health care will become cheaper by everyone making use of it is like saying houses will get cheaper if we all took out mortgages. Mortgage rates may go down, banks may take a smaller profit margin and make it up in volume, and your payment may even decrease a bit, but the cost of the house won’t go down.

    Ultimately, insurance companies just help finance payments to providers. Paying these providers is the major cost, a federally mandated minimum of 80% of your insurance premium. Nothing has been done to decrease the costs of healthcare, only marginally increase the efficiency of how it’s financed.

  4. randy says:

    In the past, private health insurers skimmed as much as they wanted in the money transfer between the consumer and the provider. Now, 80 to 85 cents of a premium dollar must go specifically to healthcare goods and services. My question is, even if private health insurers adhere to the 80 to 85 percent rule, they still make huge returns on the remaining 15 to 20 percent of the skimmed money that they get to keep. Shysters! Nothing but shysters!

Share