Short Takes On News & Events

Report: Health Law Tax Credit Could Benefit 26 Million

By Jay Hancock

April 18th, 2013, 9:23 AM

As experts focus on the cost of requiring everybody to have health coverage next year, a new study highlights the broad reach of federal subsidies to help people pay for it. Nearly 26 million Americans will be eligible for tax credits under the Affordable Care Act to partly offset the cost of insurance in online state marketplaces, says Families USA, a consumer interest group that supports the health law.

The credits, which are supposed to take the form of instant discounts when people buy coverage in the online exchanges, extend high into the middle class and across racial groups, the report says. The subsidies are intended to work in tandem with an expansion of Medicaid for lower-income families to bring health insurance to a projected 16 million next year who now lack it and eventually to more than 30 million.

Households with incomes of between $47,100 and $94,200 for a family of four will make up slightly more than half of those eligible for tax credits, the study said. About 58 percent of those eligible for credits will be white, about 23 percent will be Hispanic and about 11 percent will be black, according to the study. Young adults are “the likeliest age group” to be eligible, the report said. Because most people already have coverage through an employer, not all those eligible for credits will take them. Families USA hired consultants the Lewin Group, a sister company of UnitedHealthcare, the biggest private health insurer, to conduct the research for the paper.

The study offers hypothetical cases for “silver” coverage — a medium-benefit plan on the exchanges. From the report:

Jane Smith, age 45, no children, annual income of $23,000 (about 200 percent of poverty): If the annual premium for the silver reference plan in the state marketplace in Jane’s zip code is $5,000, Jane’s out-of-pocket contribution for premiums for the silver reference plan would be about $1,450 (or about $121 a month). The remainder of her premium for the silver reference plan would be covered in the form of a tax credit of $3,550 (or that amount could be credited toward the premiums for a more or less expensive plan of her choice).

The Johnsons, a family of four (two adults, two children under age 18), annual income of $35,300 (about 150 percent of poverty): If the annual premium for the silver reference plan for family coverage in the state marketplace in the Johnsons’ zip code is $12,500, the Johnsons’ out-of- pocket contribution for premiums for a silver reference plan would be about $1,410 (or about $118 a month). The remainder of their premium for the silver reference plan would be covered in the form of a tax credit of $11,090 (or that amount could be credited toward the premiums for a more or less expensive plan of their choice).

Last month the Society of Actuaries predicted that sicker people joining plans next year would help increase claims expense by 32 percent for individual insurance, implying a sharp increase in premiums, too. Critics said the study didn’t account for the widespread availability of tax credits and the fact that benefits will be more generous.

A recent tracking poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that Americans remain ignorant of key details of the health act. KFF has done its own research on who will benefit from coverage expansion down to the zip code level. (Kaiser Health News is an editorially independent part of the foundation.)

3 Responses to “Report: Health Law Tax Credit Could Benefit 26 Million”

  1. J wil says:

    Interesting that the article did not cover tax credit recapture as income rises, nor the impact of opting not to take employer sponsored insurance. The report also seems to omit the imact on those who fall below the income level for the credit but are not covered by states who did not elect to expand medcaid.

    It is true that the coverage options are expanded, but it is unclear to me at what cost to the US taxpayers and the impact on providrs who are capped by what they can charge and thus may restrict adding patients ( a real problem here is finding a doctor who accepts a patient who has insurance versus paying the doctors charge without regard to insurance.

  2. walter says:

    Geez! Will the naysayers ever quit? Don’t they ever get tired of playing the same old tune? Boring! What’s wrong with letting the new health care reform law unfold and see what needs to be tweeked? Change is never easy, even if it might be for the better.

  3. Don Levit says:

    As the article showed premium credits can be substantial percentages of the overall premium.
    One example the credit ws about 80% of the premium!
    What was not explained was the difficulty of qualifying for credits.
    For example, if an employer offers a “qualified plan,” and the employee’s premium is less than 9.5% of his household income, his coverage is affordable.
    The coverage is affordable regardless if the dependents’ cost exceeds over 9.5% of househole income .
    Affordable coverage is not eligible for subsidies, even if the coverage is not taken by the employee.
    As dependents,, the kids would not be eligible for subsidies.
    Fortunately, dependents (of which must be offered coverage if employees are offered coverage) do not include the spouse.
    Thus, the spouse may qualify for the subsidies!
    Don Levit