Short Takes On News & Events

Under Tight Budgets, Public Health Spending Falls For First Time

By Jay Hancock

January 7th, 2013, 5:43 PM

Policymakers took heart from another year of relatively slow health-spending growth in 2011, documented by government statisticians and disclosed in a report Monday. But one aspect of moderating health expenditures — and the only category showing outright decline — could cost more than it saves. Hit by recession and tight budgets, spending on public health by federal, state and local governments fell in 2011 for the first time since analysts started tracking the numbers in 1960.

“Public health is adaptable, but the resource reductions now have been so substantial that it truly does put the public’s health at risk,” said Dr. Georges C. Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, an organization of public health pros. “I’m usually a little reluctant to say that, but we’re at that point.”

Research links higher public health spending with reduced rates of infant mortality, preventable deaths in adults and other measures of community health.

“We’ve got strong evidence there is a connection between resources invested in public health and health outcomes,” said Glen P. Mays, a professor at the University of Kentucky whose 2011 Health Affairs article associated a 10 percent increase in local public health spending over more than a decade with reductions in death rates of between 1 percent and 7 percent. “That suggests that cutbacks in funding, certainly over time, could have some adverse health consequences.”

One factor depressing public-health outlays in 2011 was the expiration of a program to fight the H1N1 flu virus, which caused a 2009 pandemic, said Micah Hartman, an HHS statistician. But public health spending has slowed in other areas, a trend advocates say hurts efforts to fight disease, prepare for emergencies and ensure safe food and water supplies.

Total public health expenditures fell by 0.5 percent in 2011 to $79 billion. That’s down from growth of 4.9 percent in 2010 and 6.9 percent in 2007. Those government-wide results include sharp deterioration of state and local public health budgets. Since 2008 state and local public health departments have cut about 50,000 jobs, according to the American College of Physicians.

Anemic public health budgets jeopardize emergency preparedness progress made after Hurricane Katrina and the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, according to a December report from the Trust for America’s Health and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Twenty-nine states cut public health funding last fiscal year; for 14 of them it was the third consecutive year of tightening, the report said.

Benjamin pointed to the current whooping cough outbreak, described as the worst since the 1950s, as a threat that needs to be faced with more firepower. “A shortage of funding didn’t cause the outbreak,” he said. “But the public health professionals that are dealing with the outbreak will tell you that their response has not been adequate because of the resource problems.”

2 Responses to “Under Tight Budgets, Public Health Spending Falls For First Time”

  1. rich says:

    Gee, I guess Republicans are angry that they can’t take credit for this, huh? Fact is, GOP dopes had the idea in the first place and Romney got it passed and enacted in Massachusetts. I guess because Obama agreed with the Romneycare idea and Obama agreed with the Heritage Foundation’s mandate idea, racist Republicans just could let a black man take credit for that, huh? Imagine where America’s healthcare system would be had the GOP decided to cooperate instead of spending all of their time trying to obstruct Obamacare and spend all their political capital trying to make Obama a one-termer. Republican dopes just don’t get it, do they? These tea party nitwits can’t get it through their thick heads that they lost the healthcare argument! In November 2012, voters decided that repealing Obamacare was the wrong path, as did the Supreme Court, and that Obamacare wasn’t such a bad deal. Now we are seeing that Obamacare actually lowered healthcare costs as related in this article. Get a life you Republican morons!