Health Care In The States

Study: Few Healthy Food Choices At Calif. Children’s Hospitals

By Christian Torres

December 1st, 2011, 4:18 PM

Fried food, a cookie, ice cream and soda.

It’s a dieter’s nightmare. It’s also what many children’s hospitals in California are offering their patients, staff and visitors.

Photo by TheCulinaryGeek via Flickr

Researchers with the UCLA School of Medicine and RAND Corporation visited the state’s 14 major children’s hospitals last year and found many less-than-ideal food options. According to their study published Thursday in Academic Pediatrics, only 7 percent of hospital entrees were deemed healthy.

“That’s a low number made worse by the fact that they weren’t labeled healthy options, and there was no calorie information available,” said Lenard Lesser, a physician at UCLA Family Health Center and the study’s lead author. “With so many people eating there, children’s hospitals should be exemplars for healthy eating.”

Lesser himself visited children’s hospitals for the study and saw many food venues with sugar-sweetened beverages, fried chicken, burgers, fries and, conveniently located by the cash register, large refrigerators full of ice cream.

The study looked at 16 total food venues – cafeterias and snack bars catering to the hospitals’ outpatients and staff. It did not evaluate food offered to inpatients.

Of the food sellers surveyed, 12 didn’t offer whole-wheat bread, seven didn’t offer low-fat or fat-free salad dressing, and 13 offered ice cream, cookies, or other unhealthy “impulse” items at checkout. In addition, 11 venues were missing nutrition information at the point of purchase.

Researchers also rated each food venue overall based on a modified version of a nutrition scale used for restaurants and other eating establishments.The rating — which accounts for factors like the number of healthy entrees available, pricing and availability of calorie information — goes from 0 (least healthy) to 37 (most healthy). The 16 venues averaged a 19.1, with only one scoring higher than a 23. There is no definitive cutoff to determine whether a food venue is healthy, but Lesser said that some hospitals scored around the same level as a fast food restaurant.

There were, however, a few positive signs in the study: All venues offered diet soda and low-fat or skim milk, while a majority also offered baked chips, fruit, non-fried vegetables or a salad bar.

The survey was conducted in July 2010, and Lesser emailed all 14 hospitals their results soon afterward. He heard back from and is now working with two hospitals — UCLA‘s Mattel Children’s Hospital and Stanford’s Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital — to improve their food offerings.

UCLA has eliminated fried food and trans fats, both in its food venues and on its menu for inpatients. The hospital also decreased the price per pound at its salad bar — a change that bumped up salad sales by 45 percent — and made water and juice standard with combo meals, said Dana Hunnes, a clinical dietitian who helps advise the hospital’s cafeteria. Sugar-sweetened beverages are now more expensive and sales of them have gone down, Hunnes added.

This past summer, Stanford removed sugar-sweetened beverages and added healthy eating signage to its venues, said spokeswoman Reena Mukamal. The hospital’s cafe and cafeterias also added more locally grown, organic produce and replaced the ice cream and cookies at checkout with apples and bananas.

One Response to “Study: Few Healthy Food Choices At Calif. Children’s Hospitals”

  1. David says:

    RE: Study: Few Healthy Food Choices At Calif. Children’s Hospitals

    This is why certain hospitals should not get any further government funding until they get their act together. Up until now, the insurance companies picked the winners and losers. If a hospital paid enough in kick-backs, the insurance company would continue to use them for their subscribers. That must stop! Medicare payments should stop! Medicaid payments should stop! Why continue to reward bad behavior? We need more unannounced inspections of hospital activities by independent groups like AARP. After leaving the hospital, all consumers should be surveyed about their experience and, based on those surveys, funding should be determined. It’s time that the consumer picks the winners and losers. It’s time that we reward good providers and stop rewarding the lousy providers. It’s time to reward good outcomes and wellness. It’s time to force providers to either shape up of ship out! The consumer needs to determine if a provider can continue to operate, not corrupt insurance companies that get kick-backs. For far too long, AHIP and the AMA and PhRMA have been running the health care show and the consumer was the least of their concerns. That must be reversed. The consumer must begin to be the top priority. Politicians that take bribes from these lobby groups, BEWARE! You will face the wrath of the voters in 2012!

Share